The European Parliament's rapporteur on the retention of traffic data resulting from all kinds of electronic communications, Alexander Alvaro (Liberal, Germany) has asked the Parliament's legal service to look into the legal foundation for this report. His doubts are founded on the fact that the report contains obligations addressed to civil parties, which is a strong indication that it ought to be in co-decision. As Mr. Alvaro told EDRI-gram, he proposes to split the draft into two separate reports. The first part would contain the law-enforcement side of data retention and remain in the consultation procedure. The other part, dealing with the industry's obligations, would have to be in the co-decision procedure. Mr. Alvaro also considers going to the European Court of Justice to get a ruling on this.

One of the problems the Parliament is facing is that it is confronted with permanently changing positions on the side of the Council. The parliament is given a strict deadline for their non-binding advice, while the Council itself hasn't decided yet on the nature of the data to be stored or even on the duration of the storage.

Mr. Alvaro will present his working document, which is quite critical of the Council's proposal, on 31 January 2005. A first draft of his report will be presented to the EP Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE) mid-March 2005. The vote in Plenary should then take place in May - unless Alvaro's proposal to split the draft is accepted. In that case the agenda would inevitably be delayed.

Latest public extended version of the draft framework decision (20.12.2004)
http://register.consilium.eu.int/pdf/en/04/st08/st08958-ex01.en04.pdf

Check for updates in the Council register
http://tinyurl.com/3ks8a

European Parliament Legislative observatory procedure view
http://wwwdb.europarl.eu.int/oeil/oeil_ViewDNL.ProcedureView?lang=2&am...

(Contribution by Andreas Dietl, EDRI EU Affairs Director)