On 8 July 2005 the German Senate (Bundesrat) is set to decide on a freedom of information law, granting formal access rights to governmental decisions. But the christian-democrat governments in many of the 16 states have threatened to block the law.

In July 2004 the German government announced the rapid introduction of the Federal Freedom of Information Act (Gesetz zur Regelung des Zugangs zu Informationen des Bundes) and on 3 June 2005 the Lower House adopted the text in second and third reading, after having considered strong objections from national health insurance companies and the parliamentary health committee. They were afraid individual medical records could be requested as well.

Though the Bundesrat officially only has a say on laws directly affecting the regional states, in this case their rejection could actually block the proposal. Normally, after such a formal objection the law could still be adopted by the Lower House. But after the upcoming elections in Germany, the Lower House might very well see a comfortable conservative majority strongly opposing the act.

The liberal-democrats (FDP) abstained from the vote in the Lower House, and also announced they would abstain in the Bundesrat vote. If they keep their promise, the christian-democrats won't be able to block the law.

Together with Luxembourg, Germany is the only country in the EU, and one of the very few in the larger Council of Europe without an access to information law. The UK was also very late in creating formal access rights. The Freedom of Information Act went into force on 1 January 2005. Earlier this month, the law was analysed by the Department of Constitutional Affairs. They found that access could be refused under no less than 210 different statutory provisions. The Secretary of State has the power to amend 183 of these. Other provisions either have already changed, or cannot be changed because they were adopted after the Act was adopted.

On 23 June 2005 the UK Government also published the first statistics on requests and results. The Campaign for Freedom of Information responded with an angry press release and said "a disturbing level of requests were not being dealt with within the Act's time limits."

The figures show that 36% of requests took longer than the 20-working day deadline, with the worst record for the Home Office. "In 60% of all requests it failed either to respond to the request within 20 days, or even tell the applicant that it needed more time within that period."

Gesetzentwurf (original proposal in German, 14.12.2005)
http://dip.bundestag.de/btd/15/044/1504493.pdf

Unauthorised English translation of the version adopted by the Lower House
http://www.informationsfreiheit.info/files/foia_germany_final_june05_t...

EDRI-gram 2.14, German promise to adopt freedom of information law (15.07.2004)
http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number2.14/akten

UK: 210 reasons to refuse a Freedom of Information request (22.06.2005)
http://195.188.8.75/php/page.php?page_id=reasonstorefus1119444004&...

DCA, Review of Statutory Prohibitions on Disclosure (June 2005)
http://www.dca.gov.uk/StatutoryBarsReport2005.pdf

Government statistics highlight "unacceptable" freedom of information delays (23.06.2005)
http://www.cfoi.org.uk/foi230605pr.html