You are currently browsing EDRi's old website. Our new website is available at https://edri.org

If you wish to help EDRI promote digital rights, please consider making a private donation.


Flattr this

logo

EDRi booklets

UK government welcomes report about data retention

27 February, 2004
» 

The UK Government has given a guarded welcome to a review of its data retention powers. The review came from the Newton Committee, which was set up by the Anti-Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 that created these powers.

The Committee, even though empowered to revoke some powers, supports the principle of data retention for up to a year. The review recommends some changes to the form of the legislation, widening the scope from fighting terrorism to the more general area of serious crime.

The Government has just published a response to this review, which agrees with the proposal to move retention from anti-terrorism to general legislation. It suggests that the most appropriate location for the powers would be in an addition to the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, which already governs access by authorities to stored communications data. This would bring retention of data under the same oversight regime as access, which is controversially regulated by the Interception Commissioner. The Committee had suggested instead that the Information Commissioner be responsible for oversight.

However, the government disagrees that a limit of one year on retention should be put in primary legislation, arguing that the communications industry changes too quickly for such a limit to be fixed in this way. Nor do the authorities promise any concrete action on limiting government access to communications data under other pieces of legislation.

EDRI-members FIPR (Foundation for Information Policy Research) and Privacy International were disappointed by the Committee's support for data retention. FIPR and PI had argued that these powers were an unjustified invasion into UK citizens' private lives under the European Convention on Human Rights. Neither group was surprised that the government welcomed the Committee's support for retention whilst rejecting its calls for even the most minor limits on the powers.

The Government's response
http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/docs3/CT_discussion_paper.pdf

(Contribution by Ian Brown, EDRI-member FIPR)

 

Syndicate:

Syndicate contentCreative Commons License

With financial support from the EU's Fundamental Rights and Citizenship Programme.
eu logo