The UK Government has finally admitted that the public are overwhelmingly opposed to the idea of a national ID card. In response to a parliamentary question from member of parliament Anne McIntosh, Home Office minister Beverley Hughes has confirmed that over 5,000 of the 7,000 responses to a public consultation on the issue were opposed to the scheme.

Recently, government ministers claimed that they received around 2,000 responses, 2:1 of which were in favour of the idea. Yet stand.org.uk, which allowed user to e-mail responses to the consultation, report that they forwarded 5,029 -- mostly negative -- messages on behalf of users. And the 798 responses sent through two phones lines (Yes and No) set up by EDRI-member Privacy International were also ignored.

Privacy International made an open government request early in May to ask the Home Office exactly how many responses they had received, and how those responses would be classified. But on the day the request was due to be answered, the Home Office told Privacy International that a similar request for information had been made by a Member of Parliament. Therefore, due to to parliamentary procedure, they would have to answer that MPs query first. (This procedure is not mentioned in the open government code that governs these requests).

The latest press reports suggest that the government intends to press on with its plans for ID cards - this time using the crime and asylum arguments that they explicitly rejected in 2002 when they launched their consultation.

Dossier Privacy International
http://www.privacyinternational.org/issues/idcard/uk/

(Contribution by Ian Brown, FIPR)