
You are currently browsing EDRi's old website. Our new website is available at https://edri.org


Subscribe to the bi-weekly newsletter about digital civil rights in Europe.
This article is also available in:
Deutsch: 3 Treffer-Gesetz in Frankreich – der zweite Versuch
Macedonian: Втор обид за воведување на законот Хад...
The Hadopi (or three strikes) law saga continues with the second reading of the draft law in the French National Assembly having started on 29 April 2009.
After the unexpected rejection of the text in the lower chamber on 9 April 2009, the majority came this time decided to pass the law no matter what. The pressure was mainly due to the present discussion in the European Parliament for the adoption of the Telecom Package which would put the Fr
This article is also available in:
Deutsch: EP verabschiedet die Verlängerung der Urheberrechtsfrist in der erste...
Although largely opposed by some EU Member States in the Council, criticized by the consumers' organizations and strongly opposed by 4 out of the 7 main political groups (ALDE, GREENS/EFA, NGL, IND/ DEM) in the European Parliament (EP), the directive on performers copyright term extension was passed by the MEPs in the first reading on 23 April 2009.
Besides the four groups, there were other national delegations and key MEPs who joined the fight to reject the directive, but the final vote was 317 in favour, 178 against, 37 abstentions.
The report by Irish MEP Brian Crowley proposed the extensio
This article is also available in:
Deutsch: Verlängerte Urheberrechtsfrist für Tonaufnahmen abgelehnt
The proposal for the extension of the copyright terms for sound recordings was rejected on 27 March 2009 by COREPER, which has the task to negotiate a consensus before the EU Council of Ministers takes votes.
To the great disappointment of the recording industry, COREPER rejected the extension of the copyright term as there was no consensus of the Member States on the matter.
This article is also available in:
Deutsch: Koalition von Musikern gegen die Kriminalisierung von Downloadern
This article is also available in:
Macedonian: [Коалиција на музичари против лицата...
This article is also available in:
Deutsch: Ausweitung der Urheberrechtsfrist vom Europäischen Parlament verschob...
Macedonian: [ЕП го одложи продолжувањето на период..
This article is also available in:
Deutsch: Der Pirate-Bay Prozess in Schweden
The big, long and extremely mediatized trial filed on 31 January 2008 by Swedish prosecutors against the four Pirate Bay founders for "promoting other people's infringements of copyright laws" started at Stockholm's District Court, on 16 February 2009.
The first day of the trial was dedicated to the opening statements of the prosecution and the defendants, the latter denying any criminal act. Prosecutor Håkan Roswall presented the claims of the plaintiffs Warner Bros, MGM, EMI, Colombia Pictures, 20th Century Fox, Sony BMG and Universal and spent most of the morning trying to describe how the Pirate Bay works suggesting it was a commerc
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in deutscher Sprache verfügbar)
The war between IFPI and the Pirate Bay continues with a new banning of the site in Denmark ruled by a Danish court at the beginning of February this year.
Exactly a year ago, in February 2008, following an IFPI action, a Danish court ruled that Tele2 had to block its users from accessing The Pirate Bay. Now, the court has issued a preliminary injunction against DMT meaning that all ISPs owned by DMT have to deny their users' access to The Pirate Bay. Also, in January 2009, TDC, the largest Danish ISP and owner of most of the cables, decided to block access to the Swedish site as a preventive measure.
However, ISPs are not happy with the decision and three of them, TDC
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in deutscher Sprache verfügbar)
Declaration to Reject the Copyright Term Extension Directive with
signatories (01.2009)
http://www.edri.org/files/Joint_Statement_Final.pdf
Reject term extension directive (21.01.2009)
http://www.edri.org/reject-term-extention-directive