<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.edri.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>EDRI - Camera surveillance</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/9/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Press release: EDRi and FREE urge European Parliament to bring an end to lawless surveillance</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edri_free</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Civil society groups European Digital Rights (EDRi) and the Fundamental Rights European Experts Group (FREE) have demanded an end to lawless spying on individuals around the globe. At a meeting with the Chair of the European Parliament&#039;s Civil Liberties Committee today, the two groups handed over a document &lt;a href=&quot;http://edri.org/files/submission_free_edri130801.pdf&quot;&gt;(pdf)&lt;/a&gt; containing detailed analysis of the current European and US legal frameworks. The document will be submitted to all relevant policy-making and governmental bodies.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In light of recent revelations, which have profoundly undermined trust in online communications tools, there is an urgent need for transparency, predictability and proportionality.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edri_free&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/spam/eu">EU directive on privacy and electronic communications</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/pnr">Airline Passenger Data</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/camera">Camera surveillance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/dataretention">Telecommunication data retention</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/wiretapping">Wiretapping</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 09:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3405 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>UK: Vehicle plate recognition video system ruled illegal</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.15/uk-vehicle-recognition-system-ruled-illegal</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_11.15_GB_Automatische_Kennzeichenerfassung_illegal?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20130731&quot;&gt;GB: Automatische Kennzeichenerfassung illegal&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Information Commissioner&#039;s Office (ICO), UK&#039;s data protection
authority, issued on 24 July 2013, an Enforcement Notice asking the
Hertfordshire police to stop using a vehicle plate tracking system that
it considered as unlawful.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The ICO notice is a result of a complaint made in June 2013 by No CCTV,
Privacy International and Big Brother Watch against the so-called “Ring
of Steel” of Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) cameras around
the small town of Royston which is tracking all cars entering or leaving
the town.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The data col
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.15/uk-vehicle-recognition-system-ruled-illegal&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/camera">Camera surveillance</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 19:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3391 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Freedom Not Fear 2012</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.18/freedom-not-fear-2012</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_10.18_Freiheit_statt_Angst_2012?pk_campaign=twun&amp;pk_kwd=20121008&quot;&gt;Freiheit statt Angst 2012&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The 4-day &amp;quot;Freedom Not Fear 2012&amp;quot; (FNF 2012) event came to a successful end on Monday, 17 September 2012.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.18/freedom-not-fear-2012&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/camera">Camera surveillance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/dataretention">Telecommunication data retention</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3090 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Two years into the Stockholm Programme: on the way to e-Fortress Europe?</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number9.23/stockholm-programme-europe-e-fortress</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_9.23_Zwei_Jahre_Stockholmer_Programm_Europa_auf_dem_Weg_zu_einer_elektronischen_Festung?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20111130&quot;&gt;Zwei Jahre Stockholm Programm: Europa auf dem Weg zu einer elektronisc...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
It has been two years now since the Stockholm Programme - a 5-year plan for
Justice and Home Affairs - was adopted. On 24 November 2011, an experts&#039;
and activists&#039; round table, organised in the European Parliament, raised
the question whether Europe was on its way to an e-Fortress.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number9.23/stockholm-programme-europe-e-fortress&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/camera">Camera surveillance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/security">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2811 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>INDECT - privacy ethics in a secret project</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number8.17/indect-secrecy-privacy-ethics</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/2165&quot;&gt;INDECT – Datenschutzethik eines Geheimprojekts&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A new document on ethical issues published by the INDECT European
research project on public surveillance has once more attracted the
scrutiny of the media. Previous allegations of secrecy were followed
by an attempt to strengthen the project&#039;s Ethics Board. The new
document however notes that addressing ethical concerns requires time
that cannot be spent on research.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number8.17/indect-secrecy-privacy-ethics&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/camera">Camera surveillance</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 17:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2382 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>French Constitutional Court: No to police access to private space CCTV</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number8.5/french-constitional-court-cctv</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/1759&quot;&gt;Französisches Verfassungsgericht: Nein zu Polizeizugriff auf CCTV im ...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On 25 February 2010, the French Constitutional Council gave its decision on
the appeal made by a group of more than 60 senators and 60 deputies against
the law reinforcing the fight against gang violence and the protection of
people under public service missions.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The appeal was referring to three articles of the law.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number8.5/french-constitional-court-cctv&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/camera">Camera surveillance</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:37:34 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2222 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Italy: The Anopticon project - putting surveillance back in its place</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number7.24/anopticon-project-italy</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/1633&quot;&gt;Italien: Das Anopticon Projekt – wie Überwachung in seine Schranken...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Nowadays, CCTVs are the practical implementation of the &amp;quot;Panopticon&amp;quot;,
theorised in 1791 by Jeremy Bentham as the &amp;quot;ideal prison&amp;quot;, one that
keeps people in place by using their natural fear of being surveilled.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Anopticon project is a reaction to the huge rise in CCTVs
installations in Italian cities.  Information on CCTVs - where they
are, what they point at, which area is being surveilled - is collected
by members of the project and put online, publicly accessible via
the &amp;quot;Big Brother Viewer&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number7.24/anopticon-project-italy&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/camera">Camera surveillance</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 17:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2151 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Stockholm programme - the new EU dangerous surveillance system</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.12/stockholm-programme-eu-surveillance</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/1431&quot;&gt;Das Stockholmprogramm – das neue gefährliche Überwachungssystem de...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Civil rights groups are worried about a new EU proposal that would enhance a
&amp;quot;dangerously authoritarian&amp;quot; European surveillance and security system that
will include ID card register, Internet surveillance systems, satellite
surveillance, automated exit-entry border systems operated by machines
reading biometrics and risk profiling systems.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On 15 June 2009, EU justice ministers discussed on the so called
Stockholm programme trying to set up the first EU &amp;quot;domestic security
strategy for the EU&amp;quot;, by the end of this year.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.12/stockholm-programme-eu-surveillance&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/technology/biometrics">Biometrics</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/camera">Camera surveillance</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 16:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1970 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>House of Lords Constitution Committee report on surveillance and privacy</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.3/house-of-lords-report-surveillance</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/1289&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The report Surveillance: Citizens and the State recently issued by the House
of Lords Constitution Committee supports privacy and considers executive and
legal limits must be imposed to surveillance and data collection.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The report is a positive step in the promotion of individual freedom and
liberty and offers some recommendations in this direction.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
One of the recommendations, following a suggestion from the UK Computing
Research Committee&#039;s, is that the encryption of personal data should be
mandatory in some circumstances and that the Government should introduce
appropriate regulations in this sense.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.3/house-of-lords-report-surveillance&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/camera">Camera surveillance</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1858 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Austria: Some EU data protection policy developments in 2008</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.2/data-protection-austria-2008</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/1270&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In Austria the international data protection day on 28 January will pass by
widely unrecognised. This year, as already in 2008, the Data Protection
Commission (DSK; the Austrian Data Protection Authority) and the Data
Protection Council (DSR; a political advisory board) will together organise
a meeting for a strictly limited amount of interested persons (max. 100
participants) where they will present European and international
developments in data protection. In contrary to 2008, where they were
confronted with by far more than 100 registrations, the event was promoted
very poorly.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.2/data-protection-austria-2008&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/pnr">Airline Passenger Data</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/camera">Camera surveillance</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/dataretention">Telecommunication data retention</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1837 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
