<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.edri.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>EDRI - Digital Rights Management</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/38/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>European Parliament draft report on private copy levies – serious or satire?</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/copylevies</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
French Socialist MEP Françoise Castex published her &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-519.560+02+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&amp;language=EN&quot;&gt;draft report&lt;/a&gt; on private copying levies on 9 October. The biggest question that the document raises is... are you serious, Ms Castex?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The policy issue being addressed is that “creators” are meant to be “compensated” for private copies that are made of legally acquired content, such as music or printed material. In some EU countries, there
are no levies, in some  EU countries there are low levels of levies.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/copylevies&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/eu">EU Copyright directive</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/DRM">Digital Rights Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2013 09:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3463 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Closed environments locking down consumers’ rights</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.14/locking-down-consumers-rights</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_11.14_Geschlossene_Systeme_sabotieren_Rechte_der_Verbraucher?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20130717&quot;&gt;Geschlossene Systeme sabotieren Rechte der Verbraucher&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Can you resell your used apps for your iOS or Android device? How about
your video games that you purchased from Valve’s Steam Store?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The answer is yes and no. Legally, you are allowed to resell your used
apps and Steam games if they were marketed in the EU.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.14/locking-down-consumers-rights&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/eu">EU Copyright directive</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/DRM">Digital Rights Management</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3380 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Marielle Gallo MEP condemns the &quot;soft-terrorism&quot; of the anti-ACTA campaign</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/acta_gallo</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
This interview was translated and republished with the kind permission of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pcinpact.com/news/71906-marielle-gallo-acta-parlement-europeen.htm&quot;&gt;PCinpact&lt;/a&gt;. We have added our comments on some of the misinformation in Ms Gallo&#039;s statements. See notes 1-6 at the end of the article.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Marielle Gallo, who is a member of the Legal Affairs Committee of the European Parliament in Brussels, proposed a draft Opinion that was in favour of ACTA.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/acta_gallo&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/43">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/DRM">Digital Rights Management</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2012 07:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3017 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Open letter to Christofer Fjellner MEP</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/acta_fjellner</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;#Swedish&quot;&gt;Swedish text below&lt;/a&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Dear Mr Fjellner,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
I am writing to you with regard to your &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fjellner.eu/pa-forekommen-anledning-om-acta&quot;&gt;recent blog post&lt;/a&gt; on ACTA. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
First of all thank you for providing a clarification after you tabled an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-%2f%2fEP%2f%2fNONSGML%2bCOMPARL%2bPE-489.406%2b01%2bDOC%2bPDF%2bV0%2f%2fEN&quot;&gt;amendment&lt;/a&gt; for the International Trade Committee vote next week calling for ACTA to be ratified. We are heartened to read that you believe that it would be irresponsible to take a definitive position on ACTA in the absence of  assurances from the Commission. You further explain that clarifications are needed on “one or two” paragraphs.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/acta_fjellner&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/44">Internet Blocking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/takedown">Notice &amp;amp; take-down</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/DRM">Digital Rights Management</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3001 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Why taking copyright out of ACTA is not the solution</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/acta_revision</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Getting rid of the copyright’s aspect in ACTA as Mrs Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger (German Federal minister of justice) &lt;a href=&quot;http://netzpolitik.org/2012/interview-mit-leutheusser-schnarrenberger-zu-acta-und-urheberrecht&quot;&gt;suggested&lt;/a&gt; would fail to solve ACTA’s inherent problems.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The following is a non-exhaustive list of issues that will not be solved by political sleight of hand.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A fair balance between protecting intellectual property rights and preserving fundamental rights would still not be achieved. As &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.laquadrature.net/files/EESC_on_IPR_Streategy.doc&quot;&gt;confirmed&lt;/a&gt; by the European Economic and Social Committee, ACTA&#039;s approach is aimed at further strengthening the position of rights holders vis-à-vis the &amp;quot;public&amp;quot;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/acta_revision&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/43">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/DRM">Digital Rights Management</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3000 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Free as in Free Culture</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number7.21/free-culture-forum-2009-report</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/1566&quot;&gt;Frei wie in freie Kultur&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Free Culture Forum (FCF), organized by the Spanish NGO Exgae together with
Networked Politics and the Free Knowledge Institute turned Barcelona in the
capital of free culture for 3 days.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number7.21/free-culture-forum-2009-report&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/eu">EU Copyright directive</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/DRM">Digital Rights Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2093 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>France: ARMT was useless</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.1/armt-useless</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/1242&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
At the end of December 2008 it was publicly presented the first yearly
report of the French Authority for Regulations of the DRMs (Autorité de
régulation des mesures techniques - ARMT) that should have ensured the
interoperability of the DRM systems and allow the private copies.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This could be very well the last report, since the new law on Internet
and Creation, could create a new authority (HADOPI - Haute Autorité pour la
diffusion des oeuvres et la protection des droits sur Internet) that will
take the place of the old one and will have a different scope: to issue
warnings and potentially cutting Internet subscriptions in cases of
copyright infringement.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
ARMT rep
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.1/armt-useless&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/DRM">Digital Rights Management</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1819 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EC public consultation of Creative Content Online</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.1/creative-content-online</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/820&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On 3 January 2008, the European Commission (EC) launched a public
consultation for the preparation of a recommendation on Creative Content
Online to be adopted by the European Parliament and Council that calls
for a common legal environment for online content, proposing multi-territory
licences.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In the opinion of the European Commission, EU policies should support the
rapid implementation of &amp;quot;new services and related business models for the
creation and circulation of European content and knowledge online.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As a result of the public consultation on &amp;quot;Content Online in the Single
Market&amp;quot; launched by the EC in July 2006, there were several calls for the
encouragement of the cooperation between industry, right holders and
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.1/creative-content-online&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/DRM">Digital Rights Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1382 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ENDitorial : &quot;No Swiss DMCA&quot; Referendum campaign</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.24/no-swiss-dmca</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/799&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Like everywhere else, DRM (Digital Restrictions Management) systems
which impose technical restrictions on what end users can do with
texts and multimedia content are highly unpopular also in Switzerland.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
At the same time, the representatives of the entertainment industry
claim that this technology is necessary, and politicians are inclined
to believe their view that there should be a law against circumvention
of DRM system. The main difference from most other countries is that
Swiss citizens are able to force a national vote about the change of
the law by collecting 50 000 signatures.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Of course the politicians know this and take it into account already
when discussing legal proposals in the commissions of the Parliament.  As
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.24/no-swiss-dmca&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/DRM">Digital Rights Management</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 19:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1377 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>UK Retailers blow the whistle on DRM</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.23/uk-retailers-drm</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/772&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Entertainment Retailers Association (ERA) asks the music industry to get
rid of DRM which they consider responsible for the continuously decreasing
of online music sales in UK.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The industry music seems to ignore the consumers&#039; preferences who are
displeased with the copy protection systems imposing limitations on the
content use. Additionally, the occurrence of various incompatible DRM
formats has led to confusion and reserve with the consumers who tend to
prefer file-sharing, lest they should find themselves in the position of not
being able to play the music on their electronic equipment.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
According to Kim Bayley, ERA director, the DRM is &amp;quot;working against the
consumer interest&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;puts consumers off&amp;quot;. In a statement to Financial
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.23/uk-retailers-drm&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/DRM">Digital Rights Management</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1363 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
