<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.edri.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>EDRI - E-government</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/37/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Inclusive E-government in Western Balkans</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.1/e-govt-western-balkans</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/824&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Most of the participants in the workshops on inclusive e-government that
took place in the capitals of six Western Balkan countries, considered that
their countries have established very few mechanisms for e-inclusion and
interoperability, even though the interest in e-Government development is
high.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The workshops took place within the framework of the project &amp;quot;Western
Balkans Network for Inclusive e-Government&amp;quot; and were meant to present the
draft research on the levels of sophistication and inclusiveness of e-gov
services conducted by project partners using the EU-level Capgemini
methodology, with a goal to develop Regional eGovernment Roadmap to
facilitate joint efforts by the countries aspiring to soon join the EU.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.1/e-govt-western-balkans&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/e-gov">E-government</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 19:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1386 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Third international conference e-Society.Mk 2007</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.23/e-society-macedonia</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
(Dieser Artikel ist auch in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/775&quot;&gt;deutscher Sprache&lt;/a&gt; verfügbar)
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The conference on the topic of &amp;quot;Inclusive e-Government&amp;quot; was organized by the
Metamorphosis Foundation last week within the frames of the project &amp;quot;Western
Balkans Network for Inclusive e-Government&amp;quot;. The project aims at
strengthening the cooperation and coordination among all the relevant
stakeholders, decision-makers, government representatives, as well as
representatives of the business, academic and nongovernmental sector in
order to improve the quality and raise the level of usability and
accessibility of electronic services provided by the public administration.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;Although the inclusion is characteristic for the countries with a more
advanced degree of development of the information society, this does not
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number5.23/e-society-macedonia&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/e-gov">E-government</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:34:13 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">1365 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Update ISOC Bulgaria</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number3.3/bulgaria</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
EDRI-member ISOC Bulgaria has published an overview of activities in 2004. From a strong focus on free and open source software, they initiated an important project to use FOSS on the municipal level. The project is steered by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) to help municipal governments in South-eastern Europe use the Internet to better respond to citizens&#039; needs. Bulgaria is the first region to use FOSS applications to enhance government transparency and people&#039;s access to municipal services. After Bulgaria, the program will expand to Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The mayor of Kardjali, the first pilot municipality in Bulgaria, expressed his appreciation for ISOC-BG publicly, in front of the President of the Republic, for the successful efforts to train and increase computer literacy of the employees and to provide grant free e-government solutions. ISOC-BG also began to work on preliminary criteria for the development of a FOSS based on-line documentation system for municipal administrations.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number3.3/bulgaria&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/e-gov">E-government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/opensource">Open Source</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sjoera</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">446 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Council of Europe outlines e-governance strategy</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number2.25/egovernance</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The Council of Europe has adopted a recommendation on e-governance on 15
December 2004. The Council recommends that member states &amp;quot;Work together
with the appropriate international, national, regional and local
stakeholders, to develop a shared vision of e-governance that upholds
human rights, democracy and the rule of law.&amp;quot; Member states should use
e-governance to
strengthen democratic institutions at all levels and make them more
accessible, transparent, accountable and responsive. E-governance is not
one-sided, but should provide opportunities for all to participate in the
process of decision-making. Finally member states should use information
and communication technologies to &amp;quot;improve public administration and
services by making them more accessible, user-centred, transparent,
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number2.25/egovernance&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/e-gov">E-government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance">Governance</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sjoera</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">356 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>E-government and privacy in Denmark</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number2.17/epriv</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&amp;quot;We are currently renegotiating the open society&amp;quot;, Gus Hosein from Privacy International stated at a conference on E-government and the protection of personal data in the Danish Parliament on Tuesday 7 September.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The vision of the Danish e-government initiative is one in which personal data are increasingly floating across traditional institutional borders, without paying much attention to the privacy challenges this raises. The conference addressed a number of data protection challenges related to e-government such as re-use of data, data retention, rights of access, and technical solutions such as digital signatures and PET. Considering the large amount of data already being stored about citizens in Denmark, and the proposed mandatory one year data retention scheme (not yet in force), several interventions stated it is crucial that privacy safeguards are enforced and that citizens become more privacy conscious.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number2.17/epriv&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/e-gov">E-government</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2004 09:00:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">240 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Analysis of online presence Romanian MPs</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number2.13/romania</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The online presence of Romanian MPs is still not very strong. According to a survey published by the Romanian eDemocracy group, the websites of the 2 chambers only present information and ignore bi-directional communication with citizens. In the absence of any interactive services, e-mail is the most important means of communication. But only 27% of the 485 Romanian MPs have a publicly available e-mail address. On average, the minimum in the &#039;old&#039; EU member states is 46%. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
32 of the 42 counties represented in the Senate don&#039;t have any senator with an e-mail address. Nevertheless, even if some MPs have an e-mail address, this doesn&#039;t guarantee their dialogue with the citizen: only 9% of the inquiries sent via e-mail receive an answer.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In a previous e-mail response study, conducted between 1 October and 30 November 2003, the percentage of e-mail addresses was 25%, with a similar small chance for citizens to get a reply (See EDRI-gram 2.6).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number2.13/romania&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/e-gov">E-government</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sjoera</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">67 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>E-Openness awards for Ukrainian city councils</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number2.13/ukraine</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
During the international conference in Kiev &#039;Freedom of Information, Transparency, E-governance: Civic Society View&#039; on 15 June 2004 the first Awards for E-Openness in the Ukraine were presented to 4 city councils. The aim of the Award is to demonstrate best practices of local authorities in interaction via official web sites. The Award is called a &#039;Crystal Dog&#039;, shaped as an e-mail @ sign on top of a glass cylinder, a name-pun on the sign called &#039;dog&#039; in popular Ukrainian.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Crystal Dogs were presented to the Kharkiv City Council, for setting the best example in online access to official documents and financial transparency and to the Kramatorsk City Council for dealing with petitions. A third award was presented to the Lubotin Town Council for the best practice amongst small towns of online deliberations and a final award to the Solomensky District Council of Kiev City for it&#039;s openness in interaction with users.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number2.13/ukraine&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/e-gov">E-government</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>sjoera</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">65 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Open source software for e-government in Bulgaria</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number2.12/bulg_os</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and the Internet Society of Bulgaria (ISOC-Bulgaria) have launched a project to stimulate the use of free/open source software for e-government projects. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The project aims to help municipal governments in South-eastern Europe to use free/open source software applications to enhance government transparency and people’s access to municipal services. Initially launched in Bulgaria, the project will soon expand to include Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Macedonia, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Under this project, which will last 18 months in its first phase, several Balkan cities will benefit from the creation of e-municipalities. The city of Kurdjali, which serves as a pilot, requested the support of UNDP and ISOC–Bulgaria to help enhance citizens’ access to services and information resources and reduce the cost of the access tools that are required to be part of the global networked economy. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number2.12/bulg_os&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/e-gov">E-government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/opensource">Open Source</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2004 09:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">79 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>New freedom of information law in the Ukraine</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number2.10/ukraine</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
On 11 May 2004 the Ukrainian Parliament (Verkhovna Rada) adopted the new wording of a draft law amending several legislative acts concerning the protection of state secrets. This draft law was initially approved in July 2003, but was subsequently vetoed by the President due to several technical inaccuracies (incorrect numeration of articles, repeating several similar provisions, etc.).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The right of printed media journalists to freely receive, use, disseminate and store information will be limited to information which has &#039;open access mode&#039; (amendments to Article 2(1) and Article 26(2) of the Law &#039;On Printed Mass Media&#039;). This &#039;mode&#039; is not defined in any law. This seems to be a violation of Article 34 of the Ukrainian Constitution, that does not limit freedom of information to any kinds or modes of information.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number2.10/ukraine&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/e-gov">E-government</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2004 09:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">138 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Irish e-voting system under scrutiny</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number2.7/evote</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The proposed e-voting system in Ireland is under scrutiny due to concerns about fraud. An independent committee of 5 experts is commissioned to look into the alleged flaws of the system. The report is due out on 1 May.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Irish government plans to introduce electronic voting machines from the Dutch company Nedap for the next European and regional elections in June. The system contains software by the Dutch firm Groenendaal and voting hardware made by Nedap. The same system has been used in the Netherlands for many years.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Civil liberty groups and the Labour Party have severely criticised the lack of an audit trail for the voter. After voting, the voter can not check if his or her vote is recorded correctly. The system does not provide a paper trail for possible recounts.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The debate about e-voting in Ireland gained intensity in March 2003, when a negative security assessment was obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. The assessment was carried out by the security company Zerflow at the request of the Department of the Environment and Local Government. The Irish government tried to keep the report secret, with adverse effects.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number2.7/evote&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/e-gov">E-government</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance">Governance</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2004 09:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">206 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
