<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.edri.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>EDRI - Access to information</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/36/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>How much longer before web accessibility?</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.15/web-accessibility-2013</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_11.15_Barrierefreier_Zugang_Wie_lange_muessen_wir_noch_warten?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20130731&quot;&gt;Barrierefreier Zugang zum Netz: Wie lange müssen wir noch warten?&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Access to the so-called Digital Society through the Information and
Communication Technologies (ICTs) is increasingly gaining importance in
our everyday life. Access to the web, where these technologies usually
converge, is already a fundamental right that everyone should enjoy,
including persons with disabilities, who represent 15 % of the European
population. Today, ICTs and the web are the gateway to public services,
education, employment, leisure etc.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.15/web-accessibility-2013&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/access">Access to information</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 19:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3388 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SIF Unconference: Enforcement through &quot;self-&quot;Regulation - who ever thought this was a good idea?</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/sif13</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Last week, European Digital Rights attended the second annual Stockholm Internet Forum which focused on two main themes: Internet Freedom and Security and Internet Freedom and Development. A novelty this year were the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stockholminternetforum.se/sif-unconference/&quot;&gt;Unconference sessions&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/sif13&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/43">Net Neutrality</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/44">Internet Blocking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/takedown">Notice &amp;amp; take-down</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/access">Access to information</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/press">Freedom to publish</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/spam">Spam &amp;amp; spyware</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 14:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3324 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>DFRI asks EP President Schulz for missing ACTA documents</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.7/dfri-access-to-ACTA-documents</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_11.7_DFRI_verlangt_fehlende_ACTA-Dokumente_von_EP-Praesident_Schulz?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20130410&quot;&gt;DFRI verlangt fehlende ACTA-Dokumente von EP-Präsident Schulz&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Swedish EDRi-member DFRI (Föreningen för digitala fri- och rättigheter)
has asked the president of the European Parliament about a question from
the Court of Justice of the European Union to the Commission that,
according to a Commission spokesperson, made the Commission withdraw its
referral of ACTA to the Court.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Commission has stated that &amp;quot;the question asked by the Court of
Justice as well as the letter of the Commission of 20 December 2012 have
been served also on the European Parliament.&amp;quot;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
DFRI boa
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.7/dfri-access-to-ACTA-documents&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/access">Access to information</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3275 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>CETA: EU ditches criminal sanctions.... almost</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/CETA_criminal</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
In documents seen by EDRi, the current Cyprus Presidency of the Council of the European Union made a proposal at the beginning of October to delete the criminal sanctions section of the proposed EU/Canada Free Trade Agreement. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/CETA_criminal&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/takedown">Notice &amp;amp; take-down</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/access">Access to information</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3123 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lawless, unproven filtering and blocking of content as “best practice”</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/EU-US_summit</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
On Monday of next week (29 October, 2012), the European Union and the United States will have a “summit” (&lt;a href=&quot;http://edri.org/files/eu-us_summit.pdf&quot;&gt;draft agenda&lt;/a&gt;) on “Exchange of Best Practices for Child Protection Online”. In the course of that meeting, the question of measures to prevent “re-uploading of the content” will be discussed. Both the European Commission and the United States appear to think that widespread, suspicionless upload filtering is “best practice”.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/EU-US_summit&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/takedown">Notice &amp;amp; take-down</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/global">Global</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/access">Access to information</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/security">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 07:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3122 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Clean IT – Leak shows plans for large-scale, undemocratic surveillance of all communications</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/cleanIT</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/20120921_CleanIT_Plaene_zur_Ueberwachung_des_Internets_im_grossen_Stil?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20120924&quot;&gt;CleanIT – Pläne zur Überwachung des Internets im großen Stil&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A leaked document from the CleanIT project shows just how far internal discussions in that initiative have drifted away from its publicly stated aims, as well as the most fundamental legal rules that underpin European democracy and the rule of law.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The European Commission-funded CleanIT project claims that it wants to fight terrorism through voluntary self-regulatory measures that defends the rule of law.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/cleanIT&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/id">Compulsory Identification</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/44">Internet Blocking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/takedown">Notice &amp;amp; take-down</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/access">Access to information</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/press">Freedom to publish</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/wiretapping">Wiretapping</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 07:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3080 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Macedonia: Serious challenges for access to public information</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.16/macedonia-acces-to-public-information-study</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
During July 2012, the Macedonian Young Lawyers Association (MYLA)
submitted 145 requests for free access to information of public
character to a number of state institutions (aka FOI requests).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The requests were submitted in order to obtain information about the
dynamics of implementation of the National Programme for Adoption of the
Acquis Communautaire (NPAAC 2012) which is a strategic document
enshrining specific obligations for the state institutions the
fulfilment of which affects the process of the integration of the
Republic of Macedonia into EU.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.16/macedonia-acces-to-public-information-study&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/access">Access to information</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3063 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Websites with takedown notices are pushed down in Google Search</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.16/websites-takedown-dmca-out-google-search</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Google announced on 10 August 2012 that it would change the searching
algorithms so as to lower the search rankings of websites that receive a
high number of DMCA, European (Directive 2000/31/EC) or other similar
local legislation takedown requests.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
“Starting next week, we will begin taking into account a new signal in
our rankings: the number of valid copyright removal notices we receive
for any given site. Sites with high numbers of removal notices may
appear lower in our results,” Google’s Amit Singhal wrote in a blog post.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The company has given in to the extensive and strong lobbying efforts of
the entertainment industry groups thus “punishing” websites such as
filestube.com, extratorrent.com, torrenthound.com, The Pirate Bay,
FilesTube, and even YouTube.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.16/websites-takedown-dmca-out-google-search&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/access">Access to information</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/press">Freedom to publish</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3061 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Hungary: freedom of information restricted by new draft law</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.7/foi-endangdered-hungary-new-law</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_10.7_Ungarn_Neuer_Gesetzesentwurf_zur_Einschraenkung_der_Informationsfreiheit?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20120411&quot;&gt;Ungarn: Neuer Gesetzesentwurf zur Einschränkung der Informationsfreih...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Hungarian authorities are considering adopting legislation regarding
access to public sector information that watchdogs say is
unconstitutional and would create legal uncertainty.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This comes on the heels of infringement proceedings initiated by the
European Commission (over the independence of the Central Bank and of
the Data Protection Commissioner and the forced retirement of judges) in
January, an investigation by the European Parliament’s Civil Liberties
Committee (LIBE) (prompted b
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.7/foi-endangdered-hungary-new-law&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/access">Access to information</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2012 17:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2936 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Protect Coders&#039; Rights!</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.4/protect-coders-rights</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_10.4_Entwicklerrechte_schuetzen?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20120229&quot;&gt;Entwicklerrechte schützen!&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The European Parliament is preparing to discuss the European Commission&#039;s
proposal on a draft Directive on Attacks Against Information Systems.
EDRi-member Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has submitted its remarks
urging the legislators not to create legal woes for researchers who expose
security flaws.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
EFF is concerned with the Commission&#039;s attempt to criminalize what it
determines to be attacks on information systems. EFF believes
the text is largely duplicative of the Convention on Cybercrime,
which itself is riddled with problems.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.4/protect-coders-rights&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/access">Access to information</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2890 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
