<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.edri.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>EDRI - Global</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/35/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>TPP may be worse than ACTA</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.22/tpp-worst-acta</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
A version of 30 August 2013 of the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)
Chapter of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) draft confirms previously
expressed concerns that the negotiating parties are prepared to expand
the reach of intellectual property rights to the detriment of consumer
rights and data protection.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.22/tpp-worst-acta&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/global">Global</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 18:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3483 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>US agencies have unlimited access to Internet data</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.12/prism-case-us-agencies-access-internet-data</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
According to documents obtained by The Washington Post and the Guardian,
NSA and FBI are extracting e-mails, photographs, documents, video and
audio chats directly from the central servers of nine leading U.S.
Internet companies, within a programme called PRISM which has not been
made public until now.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As one of the documents mentions, the companies in question are:
Microsoft, Yahoo, Google, Facebook, PalTalk, AOL, Skype, YouTube, Apple.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The British equivalent of NSA, GCHQ appears to gather the same type of
data from the same companies, through PRISM which allows them to
circumvent the formal British legal process for obtaining personal
material such as emails, photos and videos from an internet company
based outside of the country.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Also, an anonymous source from within t
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.12/prism-case-us-agencies-access-internet-data&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/global">Global</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3347 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Russia ratifies CoE Convention 108 on data protection</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.10/russia-ratifies-coe-108-convention</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_11.10_Russland_ratifiziert_die_Datenschutz-Konvention_108_des_Europarats?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20130530&quot;&gt;Russland ratifiziert die Datenschutz-Konvention 108 des Europarats&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Russian Federation strengthened its commitment to the protection of
personal data by ratifying, on 15 May 2013, the Council of Europe (CoE) Convention for the protection of individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data, also known as “Convention 108”.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Council of Europe Secretary General Thorbjørn Jagland received Russia´s
instrument of accession from Alexander Alekseev, the Permanent Representative and Ambassador of the Russian Federation to the Council of Europe.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Conventi
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.10/russia-ratifies-coe-108-convention&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/global">Global</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3318 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>WCIT: what happened and what it means for the Internet</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.24/wcit-what-happend</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_10.24_WCIT_Was_passiert_ist_und_was_es_fuer_das_Internet_bedeutet?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20121219&quot;&gt;WCIT: Was passiert ist und was es für das Internet bedeutet&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
After two weeks of intensive negotiations, the World Conference on
International Telecommunications (WCIT) adopted the revised
International Telecommunications Regulations (ITRs), a controversial
treaty, which has been viewed by many as an attempt by the International
Telecommunications Union (ITU) and Member States to take over the
Internet.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The conference has been hailed as a success by the ITU with 89 Member
States signing the treaty.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.24/wcit-what-happend&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/global">Global</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance">Governance</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3167 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Privacy rights as a global challenge</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.21/privacy-rights-global-challenge</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_10.21_Datenschutz_als_globale_Herausforderung?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20121107&quot;&gt;Datenschutz als globale Herausforderung&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
With more than 100 on-site participants and almost 4000 remote attendees
through the live webcast, the 2012 Public Voice Conference was, this
year again, a full success.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.21/privacy-rights-global-challenge&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/global">Global</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2012 19:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3130 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Lawless, unproven filtering and blocking of content as “best practice”</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/EU-US_summit</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
On Monday of next week (29 October, 2012), the European Union and the United States will have a “summit” (&lt;a href=&quot;http://edri.org/files/eu-us_summit.pdf&quot;&gt;draft agenda&lt;/a&gt;) on “Exchange of Best Practices for Child Protection Online”. In the course of that meeting, the question of measures to prevent “re-uploading of the content” will be discussed. Both the European Commission and the United States appear to think that widespread, suspicionless upload filtering is “best practice”.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/EU-US_summit&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/takedown">Notice &amp;amp; take-down</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/global">Global</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/access">Access to information</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/security">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2012 07:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3122 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ENDitorial: The ETNO&#039;s WCIT proposals are not as bad as some say</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.19/wcit-etno-proposals-not-so-bad</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_10.19_ENDitorial_Der_WCIT-Vorschlag_der_ETNO_ist_nicht_so_schlimm_wie_manche_sagen?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20121010&quot;&gt;ENDitorial: Der WCIT-Vorschlag der ETNO ist nicht so schlimm wie manch...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Many people have criticised the ETNO&#039;s proposals for the World
Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT), arguing that
these would significantly damage net neutrality. These criticisms are
not entirely correct – because ETNO&#039;s proposals are far worse. ETNO&#039;s
proposals would squeeze every ounce of innovation and competition out of
global Internet networks.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.19/wcit-etno-proposals-not-so-bad&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/global">Global</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance">Governance</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3104 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Some governments want more control over the Internet via ITU</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.16/itu-debates-internet-regulation</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
There has lately been controversy over proposals made by several
countries, such as Russia and China, to give more control over the
Internet to the UN International Telecommunications Union (ITU).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Key functions of the internet as naming, numbering, addressing and
identification are now carried out by ICANN, based in the US
independent IANA, and national and regional agencies. Presently, ITU
has some managing powers of the internet, such as promoting IPv6
awareness and coordinating international cybersecurity efforts. ITU’s
international telecommunications regulations (ITRS), a treaty dating
since 1988 (therefore before the existence of the web) are now under
discussions to be revised and therefore, several parties have made
proposals for the revision of the regulations.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.16/itu-debates-internet-regulation&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/global">Global</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance">Governance</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3059 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title> Prague ICANN meeting to discuss Whois data</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.12/prague-icann-meeting-whois</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
An ICANN meeting will be held in Prague between 24-29 June 2012,
where issues and topics impacting users, consumers and registrants, like
whois access and the extension of domain space with ongoing new gTLD
program, will be discussed. As a reminder, ICANN is an Internet
governing body managing mainly IP addressing and domain names and which
is implementing a multi-stakeholder model, bottom-up and consensus-based
policy-making process .
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
ICANN as an organization still needs important improvements on
accountability, transparency and public interest aspects and also in the
involvement of the civil society, activists and academics.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.12/prague-icann-meeting-whois&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/global">Global</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/whois">Whois data</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3011 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Civil Society concerns over Internet regulation and ITU</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.10/civil-society-letter-wcit-itu</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
With the World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT) to
take place during 3-14 December 2012 in Dubai, United Arab Emirates and
the World Summit on the Information Society Forum (WSIS) 2012 having
taken place in Geneva between 14-18 May 2012, a large group of human
rights advocates, freedom of expression groups, academics and
organisations of the civil society all over the world, including EDRi,
drafted a letter raising several concerns related to the preparation
process.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The letter of 17 May 2012, addressed to WCIT organiser, the
International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the Council Working Group
to Prepare for the WCIT-12 and to ITU member states, is asking for more
transparency and expresses the wish of the signatories to participate in
the preparation p
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.10/civil-society-letter-wcit-itu&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/global">Global</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 16:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2971 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
