<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.edri.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>EDRI - Security</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/29/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>ENDitorial: How antivirus vendors handle state-sponsored malware</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.22/antivirus-state-sponsored-malware</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Last month, an international coalition of civil rights organizations and
academic experts asked antivirus software vendors how they handled
state-sponsored malware. Some of them already responded and the
responses are interesting.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The letter, drafted by Bits of Freedom and signed by organisations such
as EDRi, several EDRi-members and security experts such as Bruce
Schneier, was sent to various antivirus companies (see below for a
complete list). The coalition writes in the letter that these companies
have a vital position in providing security and maintaining the trust of
internet users engaging in sensitive activities such as electronic
banking.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.22/antivirus-state-sponsored-malware&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/spam">Spam &amp;amp; spyware</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/security">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 18:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3484 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Has Switzerland become a center of spy technology exports?</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.19/switzerland-surveillance-exports-gamma</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
On 26 September 2013, Privacy International sent a letter to Ueli
Maurer, Head of the Swiss Federal Department of Defence showing concern
regarding the many companies asking for licenses to export surveillance
technology from Switzerland.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Some media reports revealed in August 2013 that companies such as Gamma
International (well known for the notorious malware soft FinFisher), are
seeking licenses to export their technologies from Switzerland.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This has led to a quick reaction from Privacy International which wrote
to more than 70 Swiss lawmakers, drawing attention to the issue.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The letter “detailed the human rights and foreign policies that
Switzerland has championed internationally, including ensuring that
businesses operating in Switzerland should exercise a duty of ca
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.19/switzerland-surveillance-exports-gamma&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/security">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Oct 2013 16:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3439 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>FBI was controlling servers located in France</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.18/fbi-controlls-french-servers</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The FBI admitted on 12 September 2013 that, in late July, it had
secretly taken control of some servers located in France in order to
plant a malware within a police action.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The agency has introduced the spyware on web pages hosted by Freedom
Hosting, meant for Tor anonymization network.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.18/fbi-controlls-french-servers&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/security">Security</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance">Governance</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3426 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Belgium ISP under cyberattack by British intelligence</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.18/belgacom-cyber-attack-Uk-intelligence</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Edward Snowden’s opened Pandora box keeps revealing extended
eavesdropping of intelligence services.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.18/belgacom-cyber-attack-Uk-intelligence&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/security">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3422 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Dutch police wants to hack their citizens&#039; devices</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.9/dutch-police-to-hack-electronic-devices</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_11.9_Niederlande_Polizei_will_die_Geraete_ihrer_Buerger_hacken?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20130508&quot;&gt;Niederlande: Polizei will die Geräte ihrer Bürger hacken&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The police should be allowed to hack into mobile phones and computers,
even when these are located abroad. This is proposed in a draft law by
the Dutch government on 2 May 2013.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
While this appears to be a powerful asset for law enforcement, in
reality it creates unnecessary vulnerabilities for citizens. Also, the
proposal ignores several alternative solutions. The police already has
the necessary means to fight cybercrime, but fails to apply them, due to
limited resources and knowledge.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.9/dutch-police-to-hack-electronic-devices&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy/wiretapping">Wiretapping</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/security">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 16:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3303 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ENDitorial: Germany sees a &quot;septimana horribilis&quot; in Net politics</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.6/net-politics-germany-update</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_11.6_ENDitorial_Eine_Woche_des_Schreckens_fuer_die_deutsche_Netzpolitik?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20130327&quot;&gt;ENDitorial: Eine Woche des Schreckens für die deutsche Netzpolitik&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In Germany, political developments in the last week have been perceived
as a frustrating defeat by the &amp;quot;Internet community&amp;quot;, as three
legislative measures that had been heavily criticised (and ridiculed)
have progressed in the Parliament.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On 20 March 2013, &amp;quot;De-Mail&amp;quot;, Germany&#039;s standard for &amp;quot;court-proof&amp;quot;
electronic communications and document exchange between citizens,
authorities and businesses, was discussed in a hearing in the Committee
on Internal Affairs of the Bundestag (the &amp;quot;lower house&amp;quot; in Germa
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.6/net-politics-germany-update&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/security">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 19:07:57 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3264 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Human rights orgs ask OECD to investigate surveillance companies</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.3/oecd-surveillance-software</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_11.3_Ueberwachungsfirmen_Menschenrechtsorganisationen_fordern_OECD-Untersuchung?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20130224&quot;&gt;Überwachungsfirmen: Menschenrechtsorganisationen fordern OECD-Untersu...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the beginning of February 2013 several human rights organisations,
including Privacy International, the European Center for
Constitutional and Human Rights, the Bahrain Center for Human Rights,
Bahrain Watch and Reporters without Borders, filed formal complaints
against surveillance software firms Gamma International and Trovicor.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development)
National Contact Point (NCP) in the UK was asked to investigate Gamma
International regarding 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.3/oecd-surveillance-software&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/security">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3219 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ENDitorial: Questions on the draft Directive on Cybersecurity Strategy</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.1/cybersecurity-draft-directive-eu</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_11.1_ENDitorial_Fragen_zum_Entwurf_fuer_eine_Strategie_und_eine_Richtlinie_zur_Cybersicherheit?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20130125&quot;&gt;ENDitorial: Fragen zum Entwurf für eine Strategie und eine Richtlinie...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A draft of the already announced EU Directive on Cybersecurity
Strategy that is circulation in Brussels seems to be totally misguided,
in EDRi&#039;s opinion.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Commission seeks to put ENISA at the heart of a network to act as
an early warning system for bad stuff on the Internet, which is good.
What is wrong is that instead of pulling together police forces,
CERTs and service providers, ENISA seeks to set up a classified
network of military and intelligence
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.1/cybersecurity-draft-directive-eu&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/security">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3191 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Major data leak at the Belgium railway company</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.1/sncb-europe-major-data-leak</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_11.1_Schwere_Datenpanne_bei_der_belgischen_Bahn?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20130125&quot;&gt;Schwere Datenpanne bei der belgischen Bahn&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
At the end of December 2012, the personal data of more than one million
customers of the Belgian train company SNCB Europe were available
on-line, at a simple query in a search engine. The data contained in the
SNCB database included names, email addresses and even, in some cases,
phone numbers and home addresses.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.1/sncb-europe-major-data-leak&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/security">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2013 19:10:28 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3187 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Commission&#039;s own internal review condemned CleanIT&#039;s incoherence and cost</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/CleanIT-evaluation</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The CleanIT project has received a huge amount of &lt;a href=&quot;http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/08/europes-quixotic-plan-to-clean-the-internet-of-terrorists/&quot;&gt;criticism from outside&lt;/a&gt; of the EU institutions.
But imagine if the Commission had been alerted to the incoherence of the planned project. Imagine if, before investing 325.796 Euro in CleanIT, the European Commission had been warned that the project lacked methodology and did not represent value for money. Imagine if the Commission&#039;s independent checks of the initial proposal gave the project a “value for money” rating that was substantially less than half the minimum average score necessary. 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Remarkably, this is exactly what happened.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/CleanIT-evaluation&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/security">Security</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 11:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>kirsten</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3180 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
