<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.edri.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>EDRI - Jurisprudence</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/25/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>ECtHR: Internet news portal liable for the offensive online comments</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.20/ecthr-internet-news-portal-liable-comments</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) ruled on 10 October 2013 in
the case Delfi AS vs.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.20/ecthr-internet-news-portal-liable-comments&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/takedown">Notice &amp;amp; take-down</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/jurisprudence">Jurisprudence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3455 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ECJ Advocate General: Google shouldn&#039;t be forced to block results</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.13/ecj-advocate-google-spain-dpa</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
In a case opposing the Spanish Data Protection Agency (AEPD) and Google
Spain, Niilo Jaaskinen, the Advocate General of the European Court of
Justice (ECJ ), issued on 25 June 2013 his opinion that, on the basis of
the Data Protection Directive, search engine service providers are, in
principle, not responsible of personal data appearing on web pages they
process.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
AEPD requested Google Spain to remove results regarding an auction
notice for a repossessed home, based on a complaint from a person who
had claimed that the search results were infringing on his right to
privacy and who had asked for the removal of the results.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.13/ecj-advocate-google-spain-dpa&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/takedown">Notice &amp;amp; take-down</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/jurisprudence">Jurisprudence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2013 21:32:42 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3362 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Turkish pianist sentenced for comments on Twitter</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.8/twitter-turkish-case</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_11.8_Meinungsfreiheit_Tuerkischer_Pianist_wegen_Twitter-Kommentaren_verurteilt?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20130424&quot;&gt;Meinungsfreiheit: Türkischer Pianist wegen Twitter-Kommentaren verurt...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On 15 April 2013, the Criminal Court of Justice of Istanbul gave Turkish
pianist Fazil Say a 10 month suspended jail sentence over comments on
Twitter, deciding he was guilty of violating an article of the Turkish
Criminal Code that forbids the “denigration of the religious values held
by a section of society”.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The pianist was prosecuted in June 2012 by the Istanbul Public
Prosecutor&#039;s Office after he had posted a series of tweets on Twitter
and was accused of insulting Islam, while t
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.8/twitter-turkish-case&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/jurisprudence">Jurisprudence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3286 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>No intermediary liability for bloggers</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.6/no-intermediary-liability-bloggers</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_11.6_Blogger_haften_nicht_fuer_Kommentare_Dritter?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20130327&quot;&gt;Blogger haften nicht für Kommentare Dritter&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Bloggers should not be considered liable for third-party comments on
their posts in cases when they have not specifically intervened in the
content at issue, as doing so would strongly affect freedom of expression.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
This is the clear position of the EDRi-member Article 19  that comes in
relation to a case now pending with the European Court of Human Rights
(ECtHR) in which a Polish municipal councillor was sued because there
had been allegedly defamatory comments to one of his posts, addressed to
the mayor of the town, during the electoral campaig
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.6/no-intermediary-liability-bloggers&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/jurisprudence">Jurisprudence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 19:02:49 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3260 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>UK court: Google liable for comments posted on its Blogger platform</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.4/google-liable-comment-blogger-uk</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The Court of Appeal of England and Wales decided on 14 February 2013
that Google could be considered liable for comments posted on its
Blogger platform unless it reacts promptly to a complaint.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Reversing a previous ruling in March 2012 of the High Court which
considered that Google, in its platform provider role, should not be
treated as a publisher, the Appeal Court ruled that the company could be
liable for the content published on its blogging platform if it allowed
content (in this case comments on a specific blog hosted at Blogger) to
remain after having received complaints that the respective content was
defamatory.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.4/google-liable-comment-blogger-uk&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/jurisprudence">Jurisprudence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3233 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ECtHR: Blocking Google Sites in Turkey breaches human rights</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.24/ecthr-google-blocking-decision-foe</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_10.24_EGMR_Sperre_von_Google-Seiten_in_der_Tuerkei_verstoesst_gegen_Menschenrechte?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20121219&quot;&gt;EGMR: Sperre von Google-Seiten in der Türkei verstößt gegen Mensche...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) decided on 18 December 2012
that the Turkish Court decision to block the entire Google Sites
breached the Freedom of Expression as foreseen in Article 10 of the
European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Turkey has a long history of censorship policy regarding Internet
content and blocking of websites.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.24/ecthr-google-blocking-decision-foe&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/44">Internet Blocking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/jurisprudence">Jurisprudence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2012 17:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3166 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title> Russia: Pussy Riot&#039;s videos declared illegal on the Internet</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.23/russia-pussy-riot-videos-illegal</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_10.23_Russland_Pussy_Riot_Videos_aus_dem_Netz_verbannt?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20121205&quot;&gt;Russland: Pussy Riot Videos aus dem Netz verbannt&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A Moscow-based court has ruled on 29 November 2012 that four videos of
the already famous dissident punk band Pussy Riot are extremist and
therefore should be banned on the Russian Internet. The court said that
all the Russian websites that do not comply with this obligation could
pay a fine of up to approx. 2500 Euro (100 000 roubles).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.23/russia-pussy-riot-videos-illegal&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/jurisprudence">Jurisprudence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 19:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3154 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>European domain names under siege</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.23/european-domains-seized-by-us</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_10.23_Europaeische_Domainnamen_unter_Druck?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20121205&quot;&gt;Europäische Domainnamen unter Druck&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On 26 November 2012, 132 or 133 domain names were seized by the U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement&#039;s Homeland Security Investigations
(ICE) in collaboration with the Europol and national law enforcement
authorities.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.23/european-domains-seized-by-us&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/44">Internet Blocking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/jurisprudence">Jurisprudence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2012 19:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3150 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Azeri opposition blogger arrested</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.19/azeri-blogger-arrested</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_10.19_%20Aserbaidschan_Oppositioneller_Blogger_verhaftet?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20121010&quot;&gt;Aserbaidschan: Oppositioneller Blogger verhaftet&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A new arrest made by the Azeri authorities raise concerns over the
freedom of speech in Azerbaijan ahead of the next year&#039;s general elections.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The well-known blogger and opposition activist Zaur Gurbanli was
arrested from his home on 29 September 2012 by several people who
identified themselves as members of the Interior Ministry’s organized
crime department.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.19/azeri-blogger-arrested&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/jurisprudence">Jurisprudence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/press">Freedom to publish</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 16:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3102 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Spanish website gets back seized domain names. After 18 months.</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.17/rojadirecta-gets-back-seized-domains-after-18-months</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: [Spanische Webseite bekommt beschlagnahmte Domain zurück. Nach 18 Monaten.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.17/rojadirecta-gets-back-seized-domains-after-18-months&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/jurisprudence">Jurisprudence</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3071 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
