<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.edri.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>EDRI - Collecting societies</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/19/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>European Parliament draft report on private copy levies – serious or satire?</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/copylevies</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
French Socialist MEP Françoise Castex published her &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-519.560+02+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&amp;language=EN&quot;&gt;draft report&lt;/a&gt; on private copying levies on 9 October. The biggest question that the document raises is... are you serious, Ms Castex?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The policy issue being addressed is that “creators” are meant to be “compensated” for private copies that are made of legally acquired content, such as music or printed material. In some EU countries, there
are no levies, in some  EU countries there are low levels of levies.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/copylevies&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/eu">EU Copyright directive</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/DRM">Digital Rights Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2013 09:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3463 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ENDitorial: Licences for Europe and fight club... only one rule</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.3/licences-for-europe-fight-club</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_11.3_ENDitorial_Europaeische_Lizenzen_und_der_Fight_Club?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20130224&quot;&gt;ENDitorial: Europäische Lizenzen und der Fight Club ... es gibt nur e...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
There was a moment in November 2012 when even the most cynical observers
of the European Commission were hopeful of an effective reform of
copyright. Commissioner Barnier gave a speech where he demonstrated that
he understood the problems. He explained that “the digital revolution
has not yet lived up to expectations in the European context” and
described some barriers to cross-border access to content as
illegitimate. Finally, the problems had been identified.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.3/licences-for-europe-fight-club&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:06:08 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3221 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ancillary copyright law under discussion in Germany</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.3/ancillary-copyright-germany-france</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_11.3_Deutschland_Debatte_um_Leistungsschutzrecht?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20130224&quot;&gt;Deutschland: Debatte um Leistungsschutzrecht&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Judiciary Committee of the German Bundestag held on 30 January 2013
an expert hearing on the proposed “Leistungsschutzrecht” (LRS, known
also as “ancillary copyright”) law for news publishers which will
require search engines and others to ask permission from news publishers
to link to their content or even give summarize news content.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The draft law was criticized by civil society groups as well as the
German association of Internet economy which pointed out the lack of
clarity of the terms used in the text and the negative effects that 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.3/ancillary-copyright-germany-france&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3218 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EDRi comments on the collective rights management draft directive</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.22/collective-rights-management-directive</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_10.22_EDRi_zur_geplanten_Richtlinie_ueber_kollektive_Rechteverwertung?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20121107&quot;&gt;EDRi zur geplanten Richtlinie über kollektive Rechteverwertung&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On 11 July 2012, the European Commission published a proposal for a
Directive on collective management of copyright and related rights and
multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online uses
in the internal market.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.22/collective-rights-management-directive&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2012 17:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3138 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EC suggests changes of the music rights management system</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.14/ec-draft-directive-collecting-societies</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_10.14_Kommission_will_Verwaltung_von_Musikrechten_aendern?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20120718&quot;&gt;Kommission will Verwaltung von Musikrechten ändern&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The European Commission (EC) published a draft EU Directive on 11 July
2012 showing the intention to introduce a system of collective rights
management to be used for the distribution of music online in the
single market.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In the EC’s opinion, the collecting societies can issue a licence for
the Internet use of a songwriter or composer&#039;s work, but some only do so
for one country.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.14/ec-draft-directive-collecting-societies&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2012 16:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3038 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title> YouTube loses a case in Germany to collective society Gema</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.8/youtube-gema-case</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_10.8_Youtube_verliert_im_Fall_gegen_GEMA?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20120507&quot;&gt;Youtube verliert im Fall gegen GEMA&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A German court decided on 20 April 2012 that YouTube was indirectly
liable for the copyrighted content posted by its users in a case brought
to court in 2010 by the royalty collective society Gema.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In this case, the defendant argued that it was not liable as it only
provided the hosting platform for its users.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.8/youtube-gema-case&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2952 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Private copy levies draft law in Portugal</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.4/private-copy-law-portugal</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_10.4_Portugal_Abgaben_auf_Privatkopien_geplant?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20120229&quot;&gt;Portugal: Abgaben auf Privatkopien geplant&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
A draft law proposed by the Portuguese Socialist Party (PS) in December
2011 is intended to set broad, exponentially increasing levies on
digital storage devices with the support of collective rights entities
like the portugese authors guild (SPA) and a collective society for the
management of private copy (AGECOP).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Taxes are introduced on all digital storage equipment, from hard and
solid storage disks at 2 eurocents/GB and 2,5 eurocents/GB for every GB
over 1TB, memory cards at 6 eurocents/GB, to telephones and other
devices not specifically list
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.4/private-copy-law-portugal&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2892 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>SABAM vs Netlog - another important ruling for fundamental rights </title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/sabam_netlog_win</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SABAM (Société Belge des Auteurs, Compositeurs et Editeurs), the Belgian collecting society for music royalties, is in the spotlight again. A few months after the Scarlet/SABAM case, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has released a new decision on the legality of filtering systems on the Internet, this time with regard to filtering of content stored on web services.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Today, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) ruled that a social network &lt;i&gt;“cannot be obliged to install a general filtering system, covering all its users, in order to prevent the unlawful use of musical and audio-visual work”.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/sabam_netlog_win&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/takedown">Notice &amp;amp; take-down</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom">Freedom of speech</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2883 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ENDitorial: Belgian music industry acts to undermine copyright law</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number9.20/belgian-music-industry-copyright</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;/wiki/goto/www.unwatched.org%252FEDRigram_9.20_ENDitorial_Belgische_Musikindustrie_versucht_Urheberrecht_zu_untergraben%253Fpk_campaign%253Dedri%2526pk_kwd%253D20111028&quot;&gt;ENDitorial: Belgische Musikindustrie versucht Urheberrecht zu untergraben&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
We have all heard the music industry make claims about the vast amount of
&amp;quot;piracy&amp;quot; going on, such as the estimation that from 2008 to 2015, the music
industry was going to lose an amount equivalent to the combined national
debt of Greece and Italy. The ever-impartial European Commission has been
similarly apocalyptic in its analysis of the situation - describing illegal
filesharing as &amp;quot;ubiquitous&amp;quot; in its report on application of the IPR
Enforcement Directive.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number9.20/belgian-music-industry-copyright&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 18:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2768 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ECJ decides private copying levies are not allowed for business use</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number8.21/private-copy-levy-ecj-ruling</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.unwatched.org/node/2324&quot;&gt;&#039;Abgabe für Privatkopien&#039; laut EuGH auf gewerbliche Nutzer nicht anwe...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On 21 October 2010, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) decided that private
copying levies on blank CDs, MP3 players and other digital media are allowed
under EU copyright law only when charged on goods sold to individuals but
not to companies.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
ECJ ruled that &amp;quot;the application of the &#039;private copying levy&#039; to
reproduction media acquired by undertakings and professionals for purposes
other than private copying is not compatible with European Union law.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number8.21/private-copy-levy-ecj-ruling&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 03 Nov 2010 18:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2434 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
