<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.edri.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>EDRI - Intellectual Property Enforcement</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/18/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>ENDitorial: Lessons from the failure of Licences for Europe</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.23/licences-for-europe-lessons-failure</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Now that the Licences for Europe has failed so comprehensively, it is
time  to reflect on what types of voluntary or self-regulatory
initiatives are likely to work and which are likely to fail.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Last May, at the Stockholm Internet Forum, EDRi ran an “unconference”
session, which brainstormed about what characteristics a self-regulatory
initiative would need to have in order to be likely to succeed.
Participants produced eight criteria. To avoid failures or
counterproductive outcomes of such projects in the future, it would be
valuable for the Commission to develop a comprehensive methodology for
analysing the context and potential for success.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.23/licences-for-europe-lessons-failure&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/eu">EU Copyright directive</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 18:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3498 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ECJ Advocate General: Forcing ISPs to block websites could be legal</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.23/ecj-advocate-general-blocking-internet-sites</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The Austrian Supreme Court has sent a request to the European Court of
Justice to clarify whether an ISP providing Internet access to those
using an alleged illegal website was to be considered as an
intermediary.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.23/ecj-advocate-general-blocking-internet-sites&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/44">Internet Blocking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 18:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3494 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>TPP may be worse than ACTA</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.22/tpp-worst-acta</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
A version of 30 August 2013 of the Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)
Chapter of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) draft confirms previously
expressed concerns that the negotiating parties are prepared to expand
the reach of intellectual property rights to the detriment of consumer
rights and data protection.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.22/tpp-worst-acta&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/global">Global</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 18:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3483 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Failure of &quot;Licenses for Europe&quot;</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.22/licences-for-europe-failure</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Ahead of the last meeting of the “Licences for Europe” initiative, EDRi
together with other four European civil rights organisations – Centrum
Cyfrowe, Kennisland, Modern Poland Foundation and La Quadrature
du Net – released, on 13 November 2013, the following joint press
release reaffirming the urgent need of an European Copyright reform.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Today, the Licenses for Europe experiment comes to an end.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.22/licences-for-europe-failure&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Nov 2013 18:26:38 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3477 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>European Parliament draft report on private copy levies – serious or satire?</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/copylevies</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
French Socialist MEP Françoise Castex published her &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-519.560+02+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&amp;language=EN&quot;&gt;draft report&lt;/a&gt; on private copying levies on 9 October. The biggest question that the document raises is... are you serious, Ms Castex?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The policy issue being addressed is that “creators” are meant to be “compensated” for private copies that are made of legally acquired content, such as music or printed material. In some EU countries, there
are no levies, in some  EU countries there are low levels of levies.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/copylevies&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/eu">EU Copyright directive</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/DRM">Digital Rights Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2013 09:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3463 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>After 3 years: French authority Hadopi keeps proving its uselessness</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.20/hadopi-3-years-of-failure</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
After three years of existence, Hadopi French authority in charge with
the infamous three-strikes gradual response system, has succeeded in
proving nothing but a large waste of public money.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
To mark its 3-year anniversary, Hadopi has issued its activity report
which shows that, to the day, it has succeeded in ordering 1 sole
Internet disconnection and, on the other hand, it has experienced large
bureaucratic problems and issues with identifying subscribers.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Hadopi has sent a total of 1.912 million notifications to French
Internet subscribers as strike one, 186 153 follow-up letters as strike
2 and has caused 1 disconnection as strike 3.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Only for 2013, Hapodi costs the French taxpayers 5.4 million Euro, large
part of it spent to answer subscribers who make request regarding
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.20/hadopi-3-years-of-failure&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 18:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3458 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Increased level of online censorship in Italy</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.20/online-censorship-italy</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
AGECOM, Italy’s independent Electronic Communications Authority, is on
the verge of undertaking the power of ordering the removal of any online
content that it deems to be in violation of the copyright law, without
the need of the parliament or court approval.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Despite strong criticism from NGOs, ISPs, other companies or legal
practitioners, the authority’ new Draft Regulation on Copyright
Protection on Electronic Communication Networks allows it to black out
foreign sites and take down Italian ones alleged to have infringed the
copyright law, within 48 hours, without any court decision.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The legislation is to be passed definitively in November 2013 after a
decision from the European Union.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
AGCOM’s bill will give the authority the power to order Internet access
provid
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.20/online-censorship-italy&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:57:56 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3456 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Spain: New penal sanctions proposed for alleged illegal linking</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.18/penal-sanctions-illegal-linking-pirated-content</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Spain plans to toughen its legislation by including penal sanctions for
publishing links to alleged pirated content.  From a very relaxed
environment some years ago, Spain is, more and more, giving in to US
pressure after having been threatened to be put on the blacklisted
countries.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Since his election in December 2011, Prime Minister Mariano Rajoy has
continued to increase its anti-piracy legislation, including the Sinde
law. Now, on the 20 September 2013, the Spanish government approved an
amendment to the penal code that introduces penalties to the admins of
sites offering links to copyrighted works without the work owners&#039;
permission.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.18/penal-sanctions-illegal-linking-pirated-content&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 18:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3427 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>German newspapers sued for pointing out an alleged illegal site</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.17/german-newspapers-name-pirate-website</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
At the end of August 2013, a group of German publishers sued newspapers
Der Tagesspiegel and Die Zeit, accusing them of assisting copyright
infringement for having printed an interview with the operator of an
alleged unauthorized ebook site, giving the site name as well - TorBoox,
which claims to be the largest ebook piracy site in Germany, with 1.5
million books downloaded monthly.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
While hosting copyright infringing material may be considered illegal,
and, in some cases, linking to illegal content and indexing links
containing illegal material has been considered illegal, to consider
publishing an interview and just naming an illegal site as an
infringement seems a little far fetched.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
“With the direct and multiple naming of the Internet address the reader
is immediately 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.17/german-newspapers-name-pirate-website&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:18:01 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3414 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The French three strikes system gave up on Internet disconnection</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.14/french-3-strikes-without-disconnection</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_11.14_Three-Strikes_Frankreich_verabschiedet_sich_von_Netzsperren?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20130717&quot;&gt;Three-Strikes: Frankreich verabschiedet sich von Netzsperren&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The French three strikes law, known as Hadopi, has for years generated
debate and controversy, primarily because it allowed for the
disconnection of the Internet connections of individuals deemed to have
illegally downloaded copyrighted material. Now, however, there  is a
slight ray of sunshine in the matter. The French Government has given up
on this approach.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
On 9 July 2013, a decree was published eliminating the possibility to
cut off users’ connections for alleged copyright infringement.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.14/french-3-strikes-without-disconnection&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:05:10 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3378 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
