<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.edri.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>EDRI - EU Copyright directive</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/15/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>ENDitorial: Lessons from the failure of Licences for Europe</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.23/licences-for-europe-lessons-failure</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
Now that the Licences for Europe has failed so comprehensively, it is
time  to reflect on what types of voluntary or self-regulatory
initiatives are likely to work and which are likely to fail.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Last May, at the Stockholm Internet Forum, EDRi ran an “unconference”
session, which brainstormed about what characteristics a self-regulatory
initiative would need to have in order to be likely to succeed.
Participants produced eight criteria. To avoid failures or
counterproductive outcomes of such projects in the future, it would be
valuable for the Commission to develop a comprehensive methodology for
analysing the context and potential for success.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.23/licences-for-europe-lessons-failure&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/eu">EU Copyright directive</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2013 18:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3498 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>European Parliament draft report on private copy levies – serious or satire?</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/copylevies</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
French Socialist MEP Françoise Castex published her &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+COMPARL+PE-519.560+02+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&amp;language=EN&quot;&gt;draft report&lt;/a&gt; on private copying levies on 9 October. The biggest question that the document raises is... are you serious, Ms Castex?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The policy issue being addressed is that “creators” are meant to be “compensated” for private copies that are made of legally acquired content, such as music or printed material. In some EU countries, there
are no levies, in some  EU countries there are low levels of levies.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/copylevies&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/eu">EU Copyright directive</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/DRM">Digital Rights Management</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/collecting">Collecting societies</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2013 09:03:22 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3463 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Closed environments locking down consumers’ rights</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.14/locking-down-consumers-rights</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_11.14_Geschlossene_Systeme_sabotieren_Rechte_der_Verbraucher?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20130717&quot;&gt;Geschlossene Systeme sabotieren Rechte der Verbraucher&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Can you resell your used apps for your iOS or Android device? How about
your video games that you purchased from Valve’s Steam Store?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The answer is yes and no. Legally, you are allowed to resell your used
apps and Steam games if they were marketed in the EU.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.14/locking-down-consumers-rights&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/eu">EU Copyright directive</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/DRM">Digital Rights Management</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3380 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Online piracy is not to be blamed for the drop in music revenues</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.6/piracy-cant-be-blamed-music-sales-study</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_11.6_Online-Piraterie_nicht_schuld_an_ruecklaeufigen_Musikumsaetzen?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20130327&quot;&gt;Online-Piraterie nicht schuld an rückläufigen Musikumsätzen&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
As continuously argued by different IT specialists, digital freedom
activists and organisations during the last few years, online piracy
does not affect music industry revenues, as it is shown by a new
research performed by The Institute for Prospective Technological
Studies which is part of European Commission’s Joint Research Centre.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
After having examined the browsing habits of 16 000 Europeans, the
researchers found there is actually a positive relationship between
online piracy and visits to legal music s
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.6/piracy-cant-be-blamed-music-sales-study&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/eu">EU Copyright directive</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 19:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3262 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>European copyright scholars: hyperlinking is not public communication</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.4/hyperlinking-is-not-public-communication</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
The Swedish Court of Appeal has referred to ECJ (European Court of
Justice) a case involving the question of whether publishing a hyperlink
to content can be considered a communication to the public and,
implicitly, a breach of the creator’s copyright (in case the hyperlink
is published without the author’s consent), under the European law.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The case in question is that of Svensson, a Swedish journalist who wrote
an article published by a Swedish newspaper both in print and on the
newspaper’s website and who claimed that Retriever Sverige AB, a
subscription service providing links to articles that can be found
online, had made links to his article available to the public, without
his permission, and, therefore, for this he should be compensated.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
But Retriever refused 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number11.4/hyperlinking-is-not-public-communication&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/eu">EU Copyright directive</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 18:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3231 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Spanish Supreme Court says Google is not breaching copyright</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.12/spanish-supreme-court-Google-cache-copyright</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_10.12_Spanien_Google_verstoesst_nicht_gegen_Urheberrecht?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20120620&quot;&gt;Spanien: Google verstößt nicht gegen Urheberrecht&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Spanish Supreme Court ruled on 3 April 2012 that Google was not in
breach of copyright with its browser and cache services.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.12/spanish-supreme-court-Google-cache-copyright&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/eu">EU Copyright directive</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">3009 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>ENDitorial: About copyright reform</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.5/copyright-reform</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_10.5_ENDitorial_Zur_Urheberrechtsreform&quot;&gt;ENDitorial: Zur Urheberrechtsreform&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
EDRi presentation to ALDE Group Meeting on 7 March 2012
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
In this short presentation, I will briefly address two points. Firstly, the
need to soberly assess the very difficult position we currently find
ourselves in and, secondly, the dangers of failing to learn from past
mistakes and endangering the openness of the Internet - its core asset that
gives it the societal and economic benefits that we all now take for
granted.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
According to Commissioner Neelie Kroes, &amp;quot;citizens increasingly hear the word
copyright and hate what is behind it.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.5/copyright-reform&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/eu">EU Copyright directive</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2913 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>UK Court of Appeal stands behind the Digital Economy Act</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.5/digital-economy-bill-court-of-appeals</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_10.5_Britisches_Berufungsgericht_bestaetigt_Digital_Economy_Act&quot;&gt;Britisches Berufungsgericht bestätigt Digital Economy Act&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The Court of Appeal has recently rejected the claims made by the two UK
ISPs, BT and TalkTalk, that the Digital Economy Act (DEA) violates EU laws.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
DEA requires ISPs to send warning letters to widespread file-sharers
advising them that complaints have been made against them, and to provide
lists of alleged infringements to music and film companies.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The ISPs brought the issue to the court arguing that DEA breached EU laws on
data protection and privacy by restricting the customers&#039; basic rights, was
incompatible with provisions set out in the E-Com
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.5/digital-economy-bill-court-of-appeals&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/eu">EU Copyright directive</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2012 19:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2907 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The plans to bring ACTA back to life</title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/acta_revival</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://digitalegesellschaft.de/2012/03/die-plane-um-acta-wieder-zu-beleben/&quot;&gt;Dieser Artikel auf Deutsch&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://politiquedunetz.sploing.fr/2012/03/les-petits-plans-de-la-commission-pour-reanimer-acta//&quot;&gt;Cet article en français&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Introduction&lt;/b&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
Following the initial discussions in the European Parliament and the overwhelmingly negative workshop that was held on 1 March, ACTA is close to dead in Europe. What are the strategies for bringing it back to life and how will this impact on other similar initiatives? How can activists ensure that our great success so far can be maintained?
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/acta_revival&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/eu">EU Copyright directive</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/taxonomy/term/44">Internet Blocking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/freedom/takedown">Notice &amp;amp; take-down</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/privacy">Privacy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/ipr">Intellectual Property Enforcement</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 14:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2900 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>EC &quot;Roadmap&quot; for review of the IPR Enforcement Directive </title>
 <link>http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.3/review-ipred-directive</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;i&gt;This article is also available in:&lt;br /&gt;
Deutsch: &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.unwatched.org/EDRigram_10.3_Roadmap_der_Kommission_fuer_die_Ueberpruefung_der_Urheberrechtsrichtlinie?pk_campaign=edri&amp;pk_kwd=20120221&quot;&gt;Roadmap der Kommission für die Überprüfung der Urheberrechtsrichtli...&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/i&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
The European Commission recently published a &amp;quot;roadmap&amp;quot; to the review of the
Directive on Intellectual Property Enforcement (2004/48/EC). As it is
becoming traditional, the Commission neatly mixes up all kinds of
infringements, from dangerous fake medicines to illegal downloads and seeks
a &amp;quot;one size fits all&amp;quot; solution.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number10.3/review-ipred-directive&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright/eu">EU Copyright directive</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/governance/eupolicy">EU Policy</category>
 <category domain="http://www.edri.org/issues/copyright">Copyright</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>bogdan</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2872 at http://www.edri.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
